International News Analysis -- Today
Investigative, Analytical, and Uncompromising
Complement to International News Analysis -- Since 1996
AUGUST 10, 2004

   Toby Westerman, Editor and Publisher                                                                                   Copyright 2004

Home


Go beyond the Internet
Subscribe to our exclusive report
International News Analysis
12 issues
only $29.95
Canadian and overseas
$39.95
U.S. funds only

Subscribe Now
U.S. Subscribers:

Subscribers
outside the U.S.:

OR ORDER BY MAIL:
International News Analysis
2364 Jackson St. #301
Stoughton, WI 53589 U.S.A.

LINKS

SUDAN: DEATH BY PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE
Murder, Mass Rape as the International Community Ponders

August 10, 2004
By Toby Westerman
Copyright 2004 International News Analysis Today
www.inatoday.com

The most eloquent testimony to the real goals of fundamentalist Islam and the lack of resolve by the "international community" may be written in the desolate, blood-soaked sands of southern Sudan, in the Darfur region (see map below). Tens of thousands of deaths and countless instances of mass rape form an irrefutable indictment of the "international community's" inability to act when faced with documented atrocity.

The United Nations itself refers to the disaster in Darfur as the "world's worst humanitarian crisis," but the "world community" fails to act. Sudan's central government in Khartoum is controlled by fundamentalist Muslims, and is known to have supported al-Qaeda. Khartoum is also a close friend of Communist China.

Sudan is unofficially assisting the Janjaweed (a "militia" of Arab tribesmen) in a war of ethnic cleansing against Christian and pagan black African villagers in Dafur, an area thought to be rich in oil resources.

The Janjaweed have killed over 50,000 villagers in the Darfur region. Although Khartoum has called the Janjaweed "thieves and gangsters," Sudanese helicopter gunships are known to fly air support for the Janjaweed, according to a recent BBC report. The helicopters pour gunfire into villages, followed by a ground assault by the Arab horsemen. Men and boys are killed, women are raped, often for days at a time by several men, villages are left desolate. Sometimes the attackers burn entire families alive.

The attacks are part of the Muslim government's response to a rebellion in the region which began in 2003. Dafur rebels claim systematic oppression by Khartoum as the cause for the revolt. Sudanese countermeasures against Darfur have left the region devastated - except in those areas resettled by Muslim Arabs.

The Darfur fighting has produced one million refugees. Press and humanitarian organizations report that Sudan's government is hindering aid to those living in refugee camps, resulting in what BBC correspondent Hilary Andersson called "cruel and slow starvation." Death stalks the camps, and searches especially for children.

The United Nations Security Council has debated what should be done in Darfur…and debated…and debated. The Security Council, comprised of the U.S., Britain, France, China, Russia and fifteen rotating members, could order immediate action, if agreement is unanimous, but no action is in sight.

The United States recently proposed UN sanctions against Sudan, if Khartoum does not disarm the Janjaweed in 30 days. Pressure from the Arab League forced the term "sanctions" to be dropped in favor of undefined economic and diplomatic "measures." Even the watered-down resolution faced strong opposition, with China refusing to vote on the proposal.

Sudan refuses to accept any peacekeepers, and the Arab League opposes "any threats of coercive military intervention …or imposing any sanction on Sudan," according to a recent AP report.

The inaction of the "international community" in the face of the "world's worst humanitarian crisis" should be a special embarrassment to the internationalists who call for UN supremacy in global affairs, and who bitterly condemn "unilateral" or "go-it-alone" initiatives.

While the disaster in Sudan has received a degree of media attention, no one has demanded to know why the "international community" remains hamstrung.

In a special irony, Moscow, which is one of the world's most aggressive advocates of the "internationalist" position, this month holds the rotating presidency of the UN Security Council - but still there is no intervention to stop Sudan's ethnic cleansing.

British troops are ready to go into Sudan, but await approval from the "international community."

Internationalists - from U.S. Democrat politicians to Russia's political elite - must answer the question posed by BBC correspondent Andersson, "Why are the massacres of civilians allowed?"

Add your name to our Exclusive Reports email list:
Email us at editor@inatoday.com

FOR OUR IN-DEPTH PRINT REPORT,
INTERNATIONAL NEWS ANALYSIS:

(12 issues)
only $29.95
Canadian and overseas
$39.95
U.S. funds only, please

Subscribe Now
U.S. Subscribers:

Subscribers
outside the U.S.:

OR ORDER BY MAIL:
International News Analysis
2364 Jackson St. #301
Stoughton, WI 53589 U.S.A.

Copyright 2004
International News Analysis Today
2364 Jackson St. #301
Stoughton, WI 53589 U.S.A.

Return to INA TODAY.com homepage